Chris Lyman is the CEO and Founder of Fonality. Fonality creates innovative and affordable phone systems for small and medium businesses. Our products include PBXtra, trixbox Pro, and trixbox CE.
The rantings of a serial entrepreneur as he wins, loses, and doesn't pull any punches in describing both...
A fellow blogging friend of mine gave me a hard time tonight about not blogging more. He wrote “I would prefer more than one nugget every five weeks.” So, I decided to put digital ink to ethereal paper and talk about a subject that has been on my mind of late.
This entry is issued as a warning to other employees, managers, CEOs, and janitors alike. I call this corporate disease: “Roses Where I Walk”.
See, I have noticed an insidious little pattern that arises as your company grows. As a CEO, sitting at the top of my firm’s food chain, it affects me every day. But, I imagine that in larger (thousand+ person) companies, it probably creeps all the way down to the VP and Director level. This dastardly practice is born with no ill intention – nay, narry a dash of malice nor a whim of Machiavellian bent. Quite the opposite in fact – this rose is born from the desire to please “the boss”. And with that desire to please, comes the byproduct of removing objectivism and therefore the ability to make smart decisions based on true data and therefore the ability improve and therefore the ability to grow.
Here is how it happens:
You become a boss of any stature and naturally you have people working for you. And, as bosses seem to, you begin to notice problems in the areas that you manage (people, quality, process, etc.) So, you start to point out those problems to your team. And, they rush to fix. Only, here is the catch. While you feel you work for *the company*, they feel they work for *you*. Your goals are misaligned from the beginning and you both don’t even know it. So, their natural attempt to “fix” what you have highlighted, is actually an effort to make *you* happy and not really to fix the company. Therefore, they will naturally end up fixing what you SEE or improving where you WALK and not actually fix the CORE problem for your customers, culture, or product.
And, they don’t even know how much damage they are doing by trying to help. Let me give you two random, yet recent examples, of this dog in show:
The Internet at our office has gotten brutally slow over the course of a couple of months. I had complained a bit about it, and IT had ordered a fatter pipe some months back. But, it was never installed and the Internet continued to slow down. One day, the inchworm packet transit really hit an all time low, and I couldn’t take it anymore. I got frustrated, and demanded that something be done. Lickety-split, IT showed up with an amazing solution for me.
See that? In an attempt to placate “the boss” they were about to give me an incredibly fast broadband experience. Who wouldn’t want that right? Problem: If only I get it, I will get a skewed perspective of the experience the rest of the employees are having every day. I will no longer be able to accurately represent them as I will be isolated from them. Whew, that was a close one. Roses Where I Walk.
Next example:
I tend to randomly “tag” a few of the thousands of customer service requests (tickets) we get each month in our tech support group. I do this to get an objective sense of the level of customer service we deliver to our customers. I then take it to the next level, by “tagging” random customers to follow *all* of their tickets. This gives me a holistic viewpoint of their experience during their entire lifecycle with our company. This tagging is one of my secret weapons and I have long used it as fodder for my cannon of change.
But, after a few months of this “tagging”, I noticed a steep improvement in our customer service group. The tickets I tagged would turn up smelling roses (hehe). The customers I watched were getting happier every day. Oh boy, aren’t we awesome!!! Uh oh. My spidey sense started tingling. Do I smell a rose? I start asking a few questions…and…my worst fears are confirmed. As it turned out, when I tagged a ticket, my Customer Service Manager surreptitiously tagged it as well. So, did his boss – the VP. Worse, I then found out that my “tagged” customers had become known as “VIP Customers” inside the entire service group and were being giving a premium echelon of service.
See how it works? My team, thinking that they were helping me, was actually HURTING the company. I want them focused on improving overall process to help every single customer and instead they have focused their extended efforts on helping just a few – the few I watched. They are being fire-fighters and not fire-marshals. Sadly, they are working against themselves; by giving my three customers amazing service they were actually having less time to improve the core processes of serviceability. Egad!
As a non-boss, you may be reading this text thinking: “What can I take from this?” Simple. Make sure you are improving the company’s entire road, not just the path your boss walks down. If you have a jerk boss who actually likes Roses Where They Walk…well…get a new boss. There is no air in their ecosystem for you to breathe anyway.
As a boss, you are no doubt reading this text, and saying: “Duh, dude. Obviously I don’t want people just making me happy.” That’s right, you don’t want it. But it FINDS you. It creeps up on you in the form of modest placation and can often be found posing (semi-nude) for actual progress. See, your staff will do it naturally and never know it. YOU have to stop THEM from pleasing YOU in effort to actually IMPROVE that which is around you. It’s trickier than it sounds, because you are at the center of every plot. So, make sure you have clear company and customer metrics by which you measure your staff that do no include how you feel about them or how they take care of you. Of course, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (the act of measuring something inherently changes the outcome of that measurement) will limit this in the absolute. But, at least by remaining conscious of this pattern you keep it in quasi-check.
Got any roses you would like us to smell?
--
Chris Lyman
Fonality CEO & Janitor
Follow on twitter!
Challenge Chris to tackle a topic!
Subscribe to the CEO/Janitor's Blog
The Other Rose
What you state is very true but it lacks one other aspect of roses. The scent of roses are so alluring that it can make a senior manager only wish to smell roses thus driving those below to only give roses.
I'll give my example, major company x (at the time 3 Billion in revenue, 20,000 employees) came and did one on one interviews to capture the inputs of it line management and sales staff on where the company was and where we thought it was going. This seems like a fantastic 360 type review to perform. Except when I offered my true assessment filled with multiple examples, that the company filled with talent and great potential was at a major decision point; losing customer mind share, clear battle lines that divided the company (a culmination of two merged companies) internally causing the company to fail to bring new products to the market and also the two halves of the company building their own competing products... Well, you can see where this is going. Instead of listening to a well thought out concern that also included recommendations on what I could do to help in the process, I was labeled a complainer and a sour apple. This affected me for promotions, stock options and worse has made me think twice about telling upper management what they need to hear versus what they want to hear. Ultimately, the wish to only smell roses forced the board to sell the company because it could not stand on its own. So it went from number one in the market to being a single digit market share holder as a business unit, part of a different company. Did I tell them something they didn't already know. Maybe not, but it is imperative as a senior manager to listen and accept employee input at all levels, piece it together to see if it tells a different story than what you hear form your direct reports. Also, just because you hear negative feedback does not always mean the person giving the feedback feels negatively about the company but maybe sharing the information because they do not want the company to fail.
Fantastic Point - "managing up"
This is a great point. Being able to accept constructive criticism from those that you manage is a critical component of remaining objective (and retaining talent). You are further correct in stating that "managing up" is a two-way street. Of course, the folks managing up have to have the courage to speak openly, but the bigger challenge is that the folks being “managed up” have to suppress their ego enough to listen, openly.
If you don't listen to those you manage with an open mind, you won't learn much about the true state of the firm. After all they, not you, are on the front-lines.
Now, sometimes, that which employees are saying, as they manage up (concerns, etc), are things you already know. In these moments, it is important to pause, listen, and thank the person for their concerns, and (if possible) let them know what your plans are for correction -- even offering your solution to the known issue and see what they think (that is what I do a lot). If this issue is too sensitive to discuss (as it is when it relates to items of fiduciary responsibility, shareholders, etc.) then I often let them know that the issue is something that I am aware of, but not in a position to speak about at this time.
The fact that your old firm: a) ignored the issue and b) dinged you for speaking up is totally unacceptable and foretells of their eventual fate.
The Yes Man syndrome.
I like to call this "The yes man syndrome". All to often people want to be able to only give a good presentation or better yet preserve the perception that they have no flaws and can accomplish any task thrown at them no matter how impossible or insane it might be.
I tend to trust people that can say 'no' to a project, or not paint the rose colored picture I may want.
Beware of the yes man.
-Daniel
I'm Laughing and Crying...
Chris,
What a great perspective. Your IT example sounds eerily familiar to many issues that I have faced in the past.
I realize now that I've been an enabler and that makes me sad.
Your article will be great ammunition as I fight future battles against what I like to call "The Sphere of Unreality", the place that most CXO's live.
Stuart
The Sphere of Unreality
Stuart,
Great name for the dilemma! Yes, I am sure you do wage this war everyday. The important thing is to not succumb to the temptation to spread a thin layer of roses in the direction of those that make decisions. As hard as it may seem, if you constantly fight the good fight of "piercing" that veil, you will eventually be recognized for your integrity and pragmatism.
Any good exec, even if they seem like they just want roses, actually wants reality. Even *they* know that only a good does of reality can help them make the correct decisions to guide the firm to greatness.
If they ever get confused - send them to this blog.
Fight on. ;)
../chris
Post new comment