PC based router

brbourdo
Posts: 378
Member Since:
2007-04-24

Hey guys,

I'm tired of the lack of features in hardware based routers, and I think I wanted to use a spare computer I have as a router. Was wondering some software packages that people recommend.

Some of the extra features that I've had a hard time finding are (for example):

- Voice VLAN support
- Better QoS Options
- Assigning Static IP's based on MAC
etc etc

Any ideas?

I do want to do this software based if possible. I don't have the money for an expensive router.

--

Brian Bourdon
www.redwatervoip.com
brian [at] redwatervoip [dot] com
Portland, Oregon



jades
Posts: 2340
Member Since:
2006-11-26
For VLAN I believe you need

For VLAN I believe you need Cisco routers but I could be wrong

Besides VLAN you can use smoothwall.org (I know that has the mac static ip) or pfsense.org (never tested it so not sure about mac static ip, although many people on this forum use pfsense)

--

Joseph Ades
josephades1_at_gmail_dot_com
(212) 937-4299



andrew
Posts: 1472
Member Since:
2006-05-30
Software Router

pFsense and Vyatta are your best options for software based routers.



datu503
Posts: 261
Member Since:
2007-06-06
Smoothwall, IPCOP, PFsense, monowall

Those 4 are widely used in our implementations.
Personally I like IPcop.
Pfsense needs embedded but more good looking as it have less clutter, small platform.

smaller user based (10 or less) we always use DD-WRT. they are cheap!
and works great for small groups. and you can charge premium... hehe!

Walden

--

Walden, Certified FtoCC Admin & Tech
www.tech-r-us.com everythingIP
www.citivoip.com everythingVOIP



jades
Posts: 2340
Member Since:
2006-11-26
Does pfsense have a web GUI?

Does pfsense have a web GUI? if so, i am interested in giving it a shot

--

Joseph Ades
josephades1_at_gmail_dot_com
(212) 937-4299



simsjrg
Posts: 118
Member Since:
2008-04-04
ja133 wrote: Does pfsense
ja133 wrote:
Does pfsense have a web GUI? if so, i am interested in giving it a shot

Sure does! :-)

--

Running: trixbox CE 2.6.2.2 | Teliax and Vitelity

FOR SALE:
------------------------------------------------
Aastra 57i - Used in box, power included
snom 300 - Used, no box, no power
snom 320 - Used, no box, no power
snom 360 - Used in box, power



mammoth
Posts: 449
Member Since:
2006-06-14
yes, it does.

yes, it does.



agit8or
Posts: 302
Member Since:
2006-05-31
Recently we have been

Recently we have been testing out Untangle. It's unique and has worked quite well in two test environments.



simsjrg
Posts: 118
Member Since:
2008-04-04
agit8or wrote: Recently we
agit8or wrote:
Recently we have been testing out Untangle. It's unique and has worked quite well in two test environments.

I am a big fan of Untangle and it runs on the same hardware as trixbox. I am still waiting for another one of the Dell SMB Deals where the SC440's are like $249 w/ free shipping.

--

Running: trixbox CE 2.6.2.2 | Teliax and Vitelity

FOR SALE:
------------------------------------------------
Aastra 57i - Used in box, power included
snom 300 - Used, no box, no power
snom 320 - Used, no box, no power
snom 360 - Used in box, power



brbourdo
Posts: 378
Member Since:
2007-04-24
You have to have 3 Static

You have to have 3 Static IP's for pFsense though don't you? I saw that under their limitations section but could have been regarding something else.

--

Brian Bourdon
www.redwatervoip.com
brian [at] redwatervoip [dot] com
Portland, Oregon



datu503
Posts: 261
Member Since:
2007-06-06
3 Static?

Hello Brian
Not sure what you meant 3 static.
one static (to internet), and the rest are private to the LAN.

--

Walden, Certified FtoCC Admin & Tech
www.tech-r-us.com everythingIP
www.citivoip.com everythingVOIP



brbourdo
Posts: 378
Member Since:
2007-04-24
Hi, Just read it under

Hi,

Just read it under "Limitations" on their "Features" page.

"Requires a minimum of three public IP addresses (will be resolved in a future release)"

Good to hear that, that isn't necessarily true though. :)

--

Brian Bourdon
www.redwatervoip.com
brian [at] redwatervoip [dot] com
Portland, Oregon



rockbochs
Posts: 128
Member Since:
2006-12-10
Both Vyatta and pfSense are

Both Vyatta and pfSense are great choices. We are an official hardware vendor of Vyatta (one of 7 in the world) and have deployed pfSense in a LOT of organizations. They are both fantastic products.

--
Creator of world class Linux/FreeBSD based appliances, including the popular PhoneBochs telephony appliance.


Mayoor
Posts: 154
Member Since:
2006-06-01
Ipcop

i have been using ipcop and is working great



SkykingOH
Posts: 9541
Member Since:
2007-12-17
>> For VLAN I believe you

>> For VLAN I believe you need Cisco routers but I could be wrong

Linux supports 802'1q VLAN's natively. I would think any Linux firewall could route between VLAN's.

The most populart VLAN standard is 802.1q, hardly proprietary to Cisco.

Scott

--

Scott

aka "Skyking"



stechnique
Posts: 733
Member Since:
2008-02-21
pfSense does not require any

pfSense does not require any static IPs.
You would be better off having one for trixbox, but none are required. You do need to have at least 2 NICs in current versions though that limitation should be removed in future versions. Of course for most firewall/routers you would WANT at least 2 NICs, right?

Also contrary to what was stated a few posts back, pfSense does not require embedded hardware. It can be run on embedded or PC architectures.



txcardio
Posts: 31
Member Since:
2008-02-14
I use Mikrotik, you can use

I use Mikrotik, you can use it with almost any hardware and it is very lean. http://www.mikrotik.com. you can also buy several variants all the way up to 7 Gig E ports with dual 3Ghz at www.titanwirelessonline.org. I have the powerrouter 732 with 4 Gb interfaces in use for a fiber wan.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.